Got Bed Bugs? Bedbugger Forums » Uncategorized

Links to two recent Youtube videos about bedbugs

(12 posts)
  1. parakeets

    oldtimer
    Joined: Mar '07
    Posts: 913


    Posted 2 years ago
    Tue Dec 11 2007 19:42:16
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Here are two videos from Youtube that made me incredibly sad ... the spokesman saying "it was treated a month ago" and bragging how they are "reducing the numbers dramatically"... while viewers are seeing the actual infestation still going on makes me so angry for these poor senior citizens. Would someone send this Youtube to Oprah? Maybe she will listen. Someone out there who is reading this post can do something. Please!

    [+] Embed the videoGet the Video Plugins

    [+] Embed the videoGet the Video Plugins

  2. nyjammin

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '07
    Posts: 664


    Posted 2 years ago
    Tue Dec 11 2007 22:29:59
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Like I've been saying: elderly, mentally ill, the poor, immigrants, etc. are all going to suffer. No one gives a shit. Every man for himself. Yet these people who have bbs have kids who go to school with other kids and hang up their jackets next to others who don't have bbs and they also ride public transportation and use hospitals, take taxis, go to movies, use our ambulances, see our doctors, etc. So, anyone have an idea of when there will be a "cure" or when a certain pesticide that shall remain nameless (like Harry Potter "He whose name should not be spoken") will come about? 5, 10, 15 years?

    I really think it's going to wind up like the year 1907, not 2007.

  3. Nobugsonme

    your host
    Joined: Mar '07
    Posts: 6,173


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 9:38:18
    #



    Login to Send PM

    thanks 'Keets. I blogged the Samuel Blackmon video because I don't think it showed properly when the story first ran. I think people should show this to their landlords.

  4. lieutenantdan

    oldtimer
    Joined: Apr '07
    Posts: 1,162


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 10:40:55
    #



    Login to Send PM

    What is it with hopes that Oprah will do a story on this? Everyone must realize that the media does not wish to discuss this topic.
    I think that it is a gag order of some kind.

  5. itchyincharmcity

    member
    Joined: Nov '07
    Posts: 262


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 14:12:40
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Oprah? Never. Where's the affirmation, the feel-good resolution, etc? It's just not her beat. But that news clip proves that local news outlets will cover the story when there is an appropriate angle.

    I think the real problem is that media doesn't understand how there is a story here, they don't know it's an area of interest or that it is a genuine problem. And, as long as the public health officials are telling the reporters that there's no threat, where's the story?

    Many bedbuggers report that even their spouse thinks they are overreacting. If you can't convince your wife, don't you think it will take a little longer to convince others? Baby steps, people.

  6. lieutenantdan

    oldtimer
    Joined: Apr '07
    Posts: 1,162


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 15:31:37
    #



    Login to Send PM

    itchyincharmcity,
    Yes, there is wisdom in your words but it is hard for me to convince my spouse on just about anything.

  7. itchyincharmcity

    member
    Joined: Nov '07
    Posts: 262


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 16:39:10
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Aha! I am single but I hear that is not uncommon in a marriage! ;)

    If only you had married Oprah...

  8. Nobugsonme

    your host
    Joined: Mar '07
    Posts: 6,173


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 18:18:31
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Well, one problem with getting coverage in the media is that they generally need real people--they need a face to take pictures of and a name to put in the story. Samuel Blackmon was willing to appear on camera and use his name. That's rare among people with bed bugs.

    I have spoken to many, many people in the media so far. Only one of these actually published anything I said, because I do not use my real name, they don't want to print it. I am not blaming them; this is how it works. But it is hard to get good coverage because of it.

    The reason I don't use my real name has more to do with running the website than anything else, but apparently it is almost impossible for reporters to find someone willing to appear on camera and/or use their names.

  9. nyjammin

    senior member
    Joined: Apr '07
    Posts: 664


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 20:20:14
    #



    Login to Send PM

    I do not under the media not wanting to cover our bb problem because we decide to remain anonymous. Why can't they just show the people from the neck down like they did in one of the videos above. His arm was covered in bb bites and his face was not shown.

  10. NotSoSnug

    member
    Joined: Nov '07
    Posts: 152


    Posted 2 years ago
    Wed Dec 12 2007 23:57:20
    #



    Login to Send PM

    Real names means real blacklisting and if you are poor and you have to rent that can make you homeless very quickly.

    It's clear to me that with the high costs of treatment, and the potential losses from rentals or sales, no one is going to want to be vocal about this in a hurry. Otherwise PCO companies will be pressured to lower treatment costs ($600 for 1.5 hours!!), landlords will be pressured to be held publicly responsible and politicians will have their pork diets reduced as wealthy property owners start balking at the publicity.

    Vested interests will prohibit any real solution until this is an obvious public health issue. Don Quixote efforts not withstanding. Thus endeth the rant.

  11. lieutenantdan

    oldtimer
    Joined: Apr '07
    Posts: 1,162


    Posted 2 years ago
    Thu Dec 13 2007 10:13:57
    #



    Login to Send PM

    I am having a problem with the media claiming that in order to do some good reporting on bbs they need real names or faces.
    I have seen plenty of news stories where they interview a person and block out the face and disguise the voice.
    It is something more than that but I can't figure it. I do believe that if all of a sudden it is found that bbs do spread disease and people are getting ill and checking themselves into emergency rooms than coverage would begin.

  12. itchyincharmcity

    member
    Joined: Nov '07
    Posts: 262


    Posted 2 years ago
    Thu Dec 13 2007 13:12:14
    #



    Login to Send PM

    I have no problem with reporters wanting real names and faces. In general, a reporter needs solid sources to convince his editor that he has a real story. And as a reader I need real sources so I can evaluate the story on my own. I don't want to read a sory about some anonymous guy in an unnamed building somewhere in my city. How does that help me assess my own risk? Is it in my neighborhood? Is the building comparable to mine? I am supposeded to have confidence in some guy complaining that his landlord won't treat the problem, but he won't name the landlord? That story would be a joke and would be useless to the reader or viewer.

    Yes, sources are kept confidentional sometimes. But the stakes are usually higher. Maybe it's a crime victim or witness who needs to be protected from retaliation. Maybe it's the source of a government leak. Or a victim of sexual assault. Bug infestations are just not seen as at the same level.


RSS feed for this topic

  • Reply

    You must log in to post.

  • 64,325 posts in 9,194 topics over 37 months by 3,457 of 10,814 members. Latest: LADD12, vivyou, dontknowwhattodo, fmlbedbugs, mongrels, scooter, onefineday, Paranoid in GA, FreetoSleep, buggedagain