Got bed bugs? Bedbugger.com » the spread of bed bugs

25% of hotel rooms have bed bugs? I don’t think so.

nobugsonme — Wed, 02 Jul 2008 06:01:10 +0000

A reporter in this video from WRAL News “5 on Your Side” in Raleigh, North Carolina says that in a study of 700 hotel rooms done from 2002-2006, 25% had bed bugs.

This article from NBC 5 in Dallas / Ft. Worth cited a similar statistic:

First, know that high-end hotels are not immune to bed bugs. Steritech, a pest control company, studied 700 hotels and 24 percent of them had bed bug activity.

But Steritech’s results were not quite so drastic.

Business Week reported in its article “The Cost of Bed Bugs” last November (one we discussed here) that,

A study by the Steritech Group, a commercial and institutional pest management company, found that nearly 25% of the 700 hotels it tracked over a three-and-a-half year period between November, 2002, and April, 2006, required treatment for bedbugs, though of the 76,000 hotel rooms in the study, fewer than 1% were found to be infested.

Got that? 25% of the hotels required bed bug treatment, in a three-and-a-half year period. But fewer than 1% of the rooms were found to be infested. Since those 700 hotels had an average of 108 rooms, that’s about one infested room per hotel. And we can assume some hotels would have had multiple infested rooms, and others none.

(Incidentally, USA Today got the Steritech data right in this 2006 article, and, bless them, they chose not to round up, citing the number of infested rooms at a comforting 0.6%.)

Bed bugs are spreading, and we can assume that the numbers may be even higher in 2008, but there is no need to panic. Even if 5% of rooms were now infested (400% more infested rooms), you would still have a good shot at avoiding bed bugs, especially if you search your room carefully and take precautions as described in our travel FAQs.

I do think we need more publicity for the bed bug problem, and this WRAL story is not a bad piece otherwise, but there is no need for panic.

What is a bed bug infestation? One bed bug? Twenty bed bugs? 200 bed bugs?!?

nobugsonme — Tue, 06 May 2008 02:58:43 +0000

This bed bug story from KHON2 (Fox) in Honolulu interested me.

First, it’s a cautionary tale about how easily bed bugs spread: this woman says she spent one hour at an event held in a hotel lounge and then unwittingly took bed bugs home:

Yumi Suh says she and several friends spent just over an hour at the veranda room at the Halekulani Hotel and returned home with much more than they arrived with.

But what really interested me was what Suh reports as the hotel’s insurance company’s perplexing response to her complaint.

Suh claims they did not deny there were bed bugs in the room Suh and her friends were socializing in. They simply did not define it as a bed bug “infestation.”

After discovering she brought bed bugs home,

Suh immediately informed the hotel and was eventually referred to its insurance company.

“When they called me they said although they did found bed bugs because the place was not infested yet — that they’re not liable,” she said.

What is an infestation?

Houghton Mifflin defines “to infest” as:

1. To inhabit or overrun in numbers or quantities large enough to be harmful, threatening, or obnoxious: rats infesting the sewers; streets that were infested with drugs.
2. To live as a parasite in or on: livestock that were infested with tapeworms.

Since even one bed bug can be “threatening, or obnoxious,” and even one will feed off of you, then by these definitions even a few bed bugs could be considered an infestation, in my opinion.

It stands to reason that the word might need to be defined differently whether one is talking about roaches, bed bugs, or flies.

Halekulani officials declined to comment because the case is still under investigation. But in a letter to Suh, an insurance investigator wrote:

An exterminator was called in the following day to inspect, based upon your report, who then did find a small scattering of bed bugs at only one table, to the lower section of the chair.

It went on to say:

After the treatment, several other chairs at this table were then found to have a very small amount of bugs at the lower section.

“One female can lay up to 500 eggs — and up to five a day — so you only need one to infest your whole house,” said Suh.

Several chairs each had “small scatterings” and “small amounts” of bed bugs.

Can some of our bed bug professionals tell us how they define “infestation”?

Suh allegedly brought bed bugs home from the hotel:

In the days that followed, more bites surfaced and more bedbugs.
“So when the Terminix guy came and we inspect the bed we found two of the bed bugs hiding in this corner,” said Suh. “It’s right there, there’s two of them. We’re going to I think just throw it away.”

Suh spent 600 dollars to treat one bedroom. She says as an acknowledgement for her notice the hotel made a “Good Will” offer of $250 dollars to her. The offer is a thank you and is not intended to be a claim payment. “They did not apologize for the inconveniences,” she said.

“Thank you” for taking our bed bugs?!

Bed bugs were allegedly found on the undersides of what sounds like at least three different chairs, so in my understanding, it would be hard to argue they just wandered out of a guest’s purse.

We definitely don’t have all the information here, but that sounds like an infestation to me.

David Segal strikes again, telling WNYC radio bed bugs are getting “hyperbolic coverage”

nobugsonme — Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:36:19 +0000

This time Segal speaks with Bob Garfield on WNYC.com’s “On the Media.” You can listen to it, or read a translated-by-a-machine transcript with lots of goofy typos by clicking here. I made my own corrections to the faulty transcript in the excerpts quoted below.

In this discussion, David Segal continues the argument he made in the Washington Post last week — that bed bug coverage is overblown in both its quantity and in its hyperbolic nature, when compared with the actual incidence of and difficulty of experiencing bed bugs.

He actually starts by making a valid point– that we need an academic study of how many bed bug cases there are in reality. I would agree with that in a New York minute. As Segal puts it:

. . . the problem with this story has always been that the stats on it are incredibly squishy. There’s just never been a good academic study that has explained exactly how bad the bed bugs really are.

Absolutely — not since Toronto (2003), anyway. And apparently never in New York. We need one ASAP.

However, I don’t agree with his assessment which follows:

David Segal: So every journalist and and almost every story that you see relies on one stat over and over again. And that is the number of calls to exterminators. And there’s a couple problems with this.

The first one is that it’s always tricky to get a sense of the scale of any problem from a party that has a financial interest if that problem gets worse. It creates at minimum the appearance of a conflict of interest.

This is a valid point. However, the stats most NYC journalists cite (and some of which which Segal cites) did not come from pest control operators but from the City of New York.

David Segal continues,

The other problem is that there are so many people who think that they have an infestation of bugs and are being eaten by bugs that psychologists have a name for it. They call it delusional parasitosis. In New York City there were two and a half thousand complaints to the housing authority in the last few years about bed bugs and the check out every one of them. And 500 turn out to be real so you have it seems two or three people who think they have a bed bug infestation and don’t, for every one that does.

Bob Garfield: So what you’re describing is literally a form of hysteria.

Whoa, Nellie! I have to cry foul here.

First of all, Segal cites NYC Housing Authority data here and in the Washington Post Article. This is itself a skewering of the statistics, since NYCHA only deals with infestations in public housing projects, with their own inspectors and their own pest control contractors. All other tenants’ infestations would be included in the data used by the Daily News — which cites much higher numbers of bed bug cases given by the NYC Housing and Preservation Department (NYCHPD) — the ones who take their stats from calls to 311 which lead to housing violations, based on HPD inspections. This agency reported approximately 6000 calls and over 2000 bed bug cases in the last fiscal year. Perhaps Segal does not understand the distinction between the NYCHA and NYCHPD data; he never mentions the latter. I assume, however, that he is not trying to mislead people (as he accuses the hyperbolic media of doing).

Anyone who looks into this issue for a while would realize that even the NYCHPD statistics are seriously flawed — they can only be considered to grossly underreport the actual incidence of bed bugs. I know this to be true: few New Yorkers call 311 to report their bed bugs as a housing violation. Many do not know to do so, and most who are aware of the option would not think of reporting their landlord either because everyone knows that when you have a problem in your apartment, you ask your landlord to fix it, or because (rightly or wrongly) they fear repercussions for doing so.

It is true that I know this only anecdotally from the hundreds and hundreds of NYC bed bug sufferers I have encountered, but I defy David Segal to prove otherwise. PCOs may certainly be overestimating the number of cases they treat, but I guarantee you the NYCHPD statistics grossly underestimate the size of the problem. They also leave out New York’s many co-op, condo, and house owners, who also get bed bugs but would never call 311 to report them.

Furthermore, there’s no evidence for Segal’s idea that more bed bug coverage = more false alarms, based on the NYCHPD data cited by the Daily News and other sources. As I wrote in my response to Segal’s Washington Post piece on 2/26,

Comparing fiscal year 2006 with fiscal year 2007, according to the stats above, the percentage of 311 complaints which are actual infestations verified by NYCHPD went up (from 25% in FY 2006 to 29% in FY 2007) — which may mean there were fewer false alarms in 2007 than 2006 (and/or, possibly, that there were more experienced inspectors, who were able to detect more infestations in the second year than the first).

Since there was undoubtedly more (and more hyperbolic) bed bug news coverage in fiscal year 2007 than FY 2006, it is not likely from this data that more news coverage correlates with more false alarms.

Finally, and most importantly, when “two or three people” call for a bed bug inspection and only one has bed bugs, it is not fair or accurate to assume that the others have delusional parasitosis, an actual medical condition. It is more likely, in my experience, that either: (a) they do not have bed bugs but some other likely explanation that is health- or pest-related (scabies, fleas, folliculitis, and very occasionally mites, also come to mind); (b) they do not have bed bugs but have heard of them, and perhaps have been exposed to them at a hotel or friend’s home, and are genuinely concerned they might have them; (c) they have bed bugs but the NYCHPD inspector does not find them. (We hear variations on all of these, every day at Bedbugger.)

Regarding scenario (c), PCOs and entomologists will tell you that bed bugs are difficult to detect, especially in their early stages. Yet bed bugs will bite from day one, and it is conceivable that at least some of these apparent “false alarms” are just undetected bed bug infestations.

I am sure it’s true that more news stories do lead to more people calling pest control operators for bed bug inspections, but it would be reasonable to assume that some of these people who read stories and call do also have bed bugs (and might not have realized this had they not seen a news report), while others will have false alarms.

Incidentally, University of Kentucky entomologist Michael Potter, who — as a tenured professor of entomology — will be making his salary whether he causes people become “hysterical” about bed bugs or not, has been cited as saying that up to 50% of people do not react to bed bug bites even if they are bitten. I am much more worried about all the people who have bed bugs and have no idea, and do not know to call for inspections, rather than those who wrongly suspect bed bugs and call.

Bob Garfield later asks Segal,

Have you gotten any kind of backlash over this piece at all? Have people who have actually been bitten by real live bed bugs called you and told you “how dare you!” or anything like that?

David Segal: A lot — and I’ve had a ton of email from people who hope that I get bed bugs, who have had bed bugs, who say “you’ve no idea what you’re talking about! It’s a total horror, and the more coverage about this the better.”

And I’m just waiting for the highly ironic infestation to begin in my own home.

I am one of those who would never wish bed bugs on anyone. However, I would concur that he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Since David Segal lives in New York City, one of his friends or colleagues is bound to have an infestation any day now. Perhaps they’ll set him straight.