<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Got bed bugs?  Bedbugger.com &#187; david segal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bedbugger.com/category/david-segal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bedbugger.com</link>
	<description>bed bug news, information, activism, and support</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 02:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
	<language>en</language>
			<item>
		<title>Washington Post prints correction thanks to bed bug activist</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/</link>
		<comments>http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Apr 2008 16:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobugsonme</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NYCHPD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bug data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david segal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new york vs. bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[newyorkvsbedbugs.org]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nyc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nyc data]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nycha]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[David Segal&#8217;s article in the Washington Post was frustrating on many levels, but most of all because the actual data presented was erroneous and misleading.
Kudos are now due to Renee of NewYorkvsBedbugs.org, who was surely the party responsible for convincing the Washington Post via this campaign to correct the erroneous information used by David Segal [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "Washington Post prints correction thanks to bed bug activist", url: "http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/" title="Bedbugger response to Washington Post article 2/26/2008">David Segal&#8217;s article in the Washington Post was frustrating on many levels</a>, but most of all because the actual data presented was erroneous and misleading.</p>
<p>Kudos are now due to Renee of NewYorkvsBedbugs.org, <a href="http://newyorkvsbedbugs.org/2008/04/05/washpo-comes-clean/">who was surely the party responsible for convincing the Washington Post</a> via <a href="http://newyorkvsbedbugs.org/2008/04/04/make-it-right-washpo/">this campaign</a> to correct the erroneous information used by David Segal to dismiss the size of New York&#8217;s bed bug problem.</p>
<p>If you recall, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202678.html">Segal argued that the media was overstating the size of the bed bug problem in the US.  To support this, Segal claimed that,</a></p>
<blockquote><p>. . . there are so many bedbug false alarms that there&#8217;s reason to assume many perfectly sane people are ringing them. In New York, the city housing authority has fielded and checked out more than 2,500 bedbug complaints in the past three years; fewer than 500 turned out to be actual infestations.</p></blockquote>
<p>That information was, of course, entirely incorrect, as well as misleading.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202678.html" title="correction to segal article in washington post" rel="nofollow">The correction now preceding the article on the Washington Post&#8217;s site</a> reads,</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Correction to This Article</strong><br />
The article about bedbugs said that 500 of the 2,500 bedbug complaints lodged with the New York City Housing Authority between 2005 and 2007 turned out to be actual infestations. After taking a closer look at its records, the authority now says it did not keep detailed reports on bedbugs until last year. Of the 1,720 bedbug complaints received in 2007, a spokesman says, 70 percent resulted in treatment by an exterminator.</p></blockquote>
<p>Nevertheless, my main complaint about the article still holds:  the information cited in the correction is still misleading.</p>
<p>Segal only chose to cite NYCHA data in his article.  The NYCHA only deals with infestations in <strong>public housing</strong>.  <a href="http://www.nyc.gov/html/nycha/html/about/factsheet.shtml" title="about NYCHA" rel="nofollow">As this NYCHA website reminds us, only 5.1% of the NYC population lives in NYCHA housing.</a>  Most tenants renting NYC apartments would not be eligible to call NYCHA to report a housing problem.</p>
<p>The vast majority of tenants in NYC would call the <a href="http://home2.nyc.gov/html/hpd/html/tenants/how_to_report.shtml" title="HPD how to report problems in an apartment" rel="nofollow">Housing and Preservation Department (HPD)</a> via the city&#8217;s 311 hotline, to report that a landlord was not dealing with a bed bug complaint.  I stress that they would <em>only</em> call 311 if (a) they lived in housing for which the landlord is reponsible for eliminating bed bugs (buildings of less than 3 units are one example of those which are apparently exempt), (b) they had tried to get the landlord to remedy the bed bug problem <em>and</em> it had not been dealt with, and (c) they were not afraid of any repercussions for reporting the landlord in this way.  (In fact, my anecdotal information suggests that most tenants with bed bugs in NYC don&#8217;t call 311; it&#8217;s also a given that zero homeowners would be included in this data, since HPD would not help them; so the HPD data is a <em>very</em> low estimate of how many tenants in NYC have bed bugs in a given year.)</p>
<p>Still, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/12/30/2007-12-30_bedbug_epidemic_attacks_new_york_city.html" title="daily news on bed bugs" rel="nofollow">as the Daily News correctly reported last year</a>,  in the fiscal year ending June 2007, there were 6889 complaints of bed bugs reported to HPD and 2008 summonses handed out to landlords as a result.  Including this statistic along with the NYCHA data would lead to a fuller estimate of how many rental tenants had bed bugs in FY 2006-2007.  It would be woefully understated, but not as much as the data the Washington Post provides.</p>
<p>The Washington Post was right to correct the inaccuracy of the NYCHA data Segal offered up, but this correction does not fully correct the inaccuracy of the facts presented in support of Segal&#8217;s argument.</p>
<p>New Yorkers should visit NewYorkvsBedBugs.org and <a href="http://newyorkvsbedbugs.org/take-action/">write a letter to their city councilpersons</a>.<br />
Do it, and things might get better.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/" rel="bookmark" title="March 11, 2008">David Segal strikes again, telling WNYC radio bed bugs are getting &#8220;hyperbolic coverage&#8221;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/05/12/nashua-nh-laws-may-change-in-part-based-on-recent-bed-bug-cases-there/" rel="bookmark" title="May 12, 2008">Nashua, N.H. laws may change in part based on recent bed bug cases there</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/06/columbia-spectator-on-bed-bugs-again-with-the-hpd-statistic-soup/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2008">Columbia Spectator on bed bugs, again with the HPD statistic soup</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2006/10/15/lexington-ky-vs-new-york-ny-a-tale-of-two-bedbug-ed-cities/" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2006">Lexington, KY vs. New York, NY: a tale of two bedbugged cities</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 13.720 ms --><p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.5.1&amp;publisher=57f95978-99d1-4eff-860f-951174e9e2fa&amp;title=Washington+Post+prints+correction+thanks+to+bed+bug+activist&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbedbugger.com%2F2008%2F04%2F07%2Fwashington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>David Segal strikes again, telling WNYC radio bed bugs are getting &#8220;hyperbolic coverage&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/</link>
		<comments>http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 06:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobugsonme</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[bed bug backlash]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bugs and the media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bedbugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bob garfield]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david segal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[dr. michael potter]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hyperbolic coverage]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[new york]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[nyc]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[on the media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the spread of bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[washington post]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[wnyc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time Segal speaks with Bob Garfield on WNYC.com&#8217;s &#8220;On the Media.&#8221;  You can listen to it, or read a translated-by-a-machine transcript with lots of goofy typos by clicking here.  I made my own corrections to the faulty transcript in the excerpts quoted below.
In this discussion, David Segal continues the argument he made [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "David Segal strikes again, telling WNYC radio bed bugs are getting &#8220;hyperbolic coverage&#8221;", url: "http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time Segal speaks with Bob Garfield on WNYC.com&#8217;s &#8220;On the Media.&#8221;  You can listen to it, or read a translated-by-a-machine transcript with lots of goofy typos by <a href="http://mediasearch.wnyc.org/m/19298299/march_7_2008_on_the_media_friday.htm?col=en-aud-pod_wnyc-ep&amp;q=bed+bugs&amp;match=QUERY" title="David Segal on On the Media">clicking here.</a>  I made my own corrections to the faulty transcript in the excerpts quoted below.</p>
<p>In this discussion, David Segal continues the argument he made in the Washington Post last week &#8212; that bed bug coverage is overblown in both its quantity and in its hyperbolic nature, when compared with the actual incidence of and difficulty of experiencing bed bugs.</p>
<p>He actually starts by making a valid point&#8211; that we need an academic study of how many bed bug cases there are in reality.  I would agree with that in a New York minute.  As Segal puts it:</p>
<blockquote><p>. . .  the problem with this story has always been that the stats on it are incredibly squishy. There&#8217;s just never been a good academic study that has explained exactly how bad the bed bugs really are.</p></blockquote>
<p>Absolutely &#8212; not since Toronto (2003), anyway.  And apparently never in New York.  We need one ASAP.</p>
<p>However, I don&#8217;t agree with his assessment which follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>David Segal:  So every journalist and and almost every story that you see relies on one stat over and over again. And that is the number of calls to exterminators.  And there&#8217;s a couple problems with this.</p>
<p>The first one is that it&#8217;s always tricky to get a sense of the scale of any problem from a party that has a financial interest if that problem gets worse. It creates at minimum the appearance of a conflict of interest.</p></blockquote>
<p>This is a valid point.  However, the stats most NYC journalists cite (and some of which which Segal cites) did not come from pest control operators but from the City of New York.</p>
<p>David Segal continues,</p>
<blockquote><p>The other problem is that there are so many people who think that they have an infestation of bugs and are being eaten by bugs that psychologists have a name for it.  They call it delusional parasitosis. In New York City there were two and a half thousand complaints to the housing authority in the last few years about bed bugs and the check out every one of them. And 500 turn out to be real so you have it seems two or three people who think they have a bed bug infestation and don&#8217;t, for every one that does.</p>
<p>Bob Garfield: So what you&#8217;re describing is literally a form of hysteria.</p></blockquote>
<p><em>Whoa, Nellie!</em>  I have to cry foul here.</p>
<p>First of all, Segal cites NYC Housing Authority data here and in the Washington Post Article.  This is itself a skewering of the statistics, since NYCHA  only deals with infestations in public housing projects, with their own inspectors and their own pest control contractors.   All other tenants&#8217; infestations would be included in the data used by the Daily News &#8212; which cites much higher numbers of bed bug cases given by the NYC Housing and Preservation Department (NYCHPD) &#8212; the ones who take their stats from calls to 311 which lead to housing violations, based on HPD inspections.   This agency reported approximately 6000 calls and over 2000 bed bug cases in the last fiscal year.  Perhaps Segal does not understand the distinction between the NYCHA and NYCHPD data; he never mentions the latter.  I assume, however, that he is not trying to mislead people (as he accuses the hyperbolic media of doing).</p>
<p>Anyone who looks into this issue for a while would realize that even the NYCHPD statistics are seriously flawed &#8212; they can only be considered to grossly <em>underreport</em> the actual incidence of bed bugs.  I know this to be true: few New Yorkers call 311 to report their bed bugs as a housing violation.  Many do not know to do so, and most who are aware of the option would not think of reporting their landlord either because everyone knows that when you have a problem in your apartment, you ask your landlord to fix it, or because (rightly or wrongly) they fear repercussions for doing so.</p>
<p>It is true that I know this only anecdotally from the hundreds and hundreds of NYC bed bug sufferers I have encountered, but I defy David Segal to prove otherwise.  PCOs may certainly be overestimating the number of cases they treat, but I guarantee you the NYCHPD statistics grossly <em>underestimate</em> the size of the problem.  They also leave out New York&#8217;s many co-op, condo, and house owners, who also get bed bugs but would never call 311 to report them.</p>
<p>Furthermore, there&#8217;s no evidence for Segal&#8217;s idea that more bed bug coverage = more false alarms, based on the NYCHPD data cited by the Daily News and other sources.  <a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/" title="Washington Post says ignore bed bug media coverage" target="_blank">As I wrote in my response to Segal&#8217;s Washington Post piece on 2/26,</a></p>
<blockquote><p>Comparing fiscal year 2006 with fiscal year 2007, according to the stats above, the percentage of 311 complaints which are actual infestations verified by NYCHPD went up (from 25% in FY 2006 to 29% in FY 2007) — which may mean there were <em>fewer</em> false alarms in 2007 than 2006 (and/or, possibly, that there were more experienced inspectors, who were able to detect more infestations in the second year than the first).<strong>  </strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Since there was undoubtedly more (and more hyperbolic) bed bug news coverage in fiscal year 2007 than FY 2006, it is not likely from this data that more news coverage correlates with more false alarms.</p>
<p>Finally, and most importantly, when &#8220;two or three people&#8221; call for a bed bug inspection and only one has bed bugs, it is <em>not</em> fair or accurate to assume that the others have delusional parasitosis, an actual medical condition.  It is more likely, in my experience, that either: (a) they do not have bed bugs but some other likely explanation that is health- or pest-related (scabies, fleas, folliculitis, and very occasionally mites, also come to mind); (b) they do not have bed bugs but have heard of them, and perhaps have been exposed to them at a hotel or friend&#8217;s home, and are genuinely concerned they might have them; (c) they have bed bugs but the NYCHPD inspector does not find them.  (We hear variations on all of these, every day at Bedbugger.)</p>
<p>Regarding scenario (c), PCOs and entomologists will tell you that bed bugs are difficult to detect, especially in their early stages.  Yet bed bugs will bite from day one, and it is conceivable that at least <em>some</em> of these apparent &#8220;false alarms&#8221; are just undetected bed bug infestations.</p>
<p>I am sure it&#8217;s true that more news stories do lead to more people calling pest control operators for bed bug inspections, but it would be reasonable to assume that some of these people who read stories and call <em>do</em> also have bed bugs (and might not have realized this had they not seen a news report), while others will have false alarms.</p>
<p>Incidentally, <a href="http://www.ca.uky.edu/entomology/dept/ipages/mpotter.asp" title="Michael Potter's web page">University of Kentucky entomologist Michael Potter</a>, who &#8212; as a tenured professor of entomology &#8212; will be making his salary whether he causes people become &#8220;hysterical&#8221; about bed bugs or not, has been cited as saying that up to 50% of people do not react to bed bug bites even if they are bitten.  I am much more worried about all the people who <em>have</em> bed bugs and have no idea, and do not know to call for inspections, rather than those who wrongly suspect bed bugs and call.</p>
<p>Bob Garfield later asks Segal,</p>
<blockquote><p>Have you gotten any kind of backlash over this piece at all? Have people who have actually been bitten by real live bed bugs called you and told you &#8220;how dare you!&#8221; or anything like that?</p>
<p>David Segal:  A lot &#8212; and I&#8217;ve had a ton of email from people who hope that I get bed bugs, who have had bed bugs, who say &#8220;you&#8217;ve no idea what you&#8217;re talking about!  It&#8217;s a total horror, and the more coverage about this the better.&#8221;</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m just waiting for the highly ironic infestation to begin in my own home.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am one of those who would <em>never</em> wish bed bugs on anyone.  However, I would concur that he doesn&#8217;t know what he&#8217;s talking about.</p>
<p>Since David Segal lives in New York City, one of his friends or colleagues is bound to have an infestation any day now.  Perhaps they&#8217;ll set him straight.</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/" rel="bookmark" title="April 7, 2008">Washington Post prints correction thanks to bed bug activist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2007/12/22/how-bad-are-bed-bugs-in-toronto-were-not-sure/" rel="bookmark" title="December 22, 2007">How bad are bed bugs in Toronto? Nobody knows for sure.</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/06/columbia-spectator-on-bed-bugs-again-with-the-hpd-statistic-soup/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2008">Columbia Spectator on bed bugs, again with the HPD statistic soup</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2007/12/22/shout-out-to-bedbuggers-in-san-francisco/" rel="bookmark" title="December 22, 2007">Shout out to bedbuggers in San Francisco</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.003 ms --><p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.5.1&amp;publisher=57f95978-99d1-4eff-860f-951174e9e2fa&amp;title=David+Segal+strikes+again%2C+telling+WNYC+radio+bed+bugs+are+getting+%26%238220%3Bhyperbolic+coverage%26%238221%3B&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbedbugger.com%2F2008%2F03%2F11%2Fdavid-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/11/david-segal-strikes-again-telling-wnyc-radio-bed-bugs-are-getting-hyperbolic-coverage/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Washington Post says to ignore the bed bug media hype</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/</link>
		<comments>http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 23:35:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>nobugsonme</dc:creator>
		
		<category><![CDATA[NYCHPD]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[Richard Cooper]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bug stories]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bug treatment]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bed bugs in the media]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[bedbugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[david segal]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[delusional parasitosis]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[epidemic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[hotel]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[journalists with bed bugs]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[panic]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[pillow]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[plague]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[stress]]></category>

		<category><![CDATA[the matchbox sign]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three articles on bed bugs appeared today in the Washington Post.  One gives a first-person account of what was apparently a not-so-serious bed bug case, and the second shrugs away the problem as a bunch of media hype.
&#8220;Yes, Tiny, Evil&#8211;and in My Bed&#8221;  is the first, and provides yet another first-person account from [...]<script type="text/javascript">SHARETHIS.addEntry({ title: "The Washington Post says to ignore the bed bug media hype", url: "http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/" });</script>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three articles on bed bugs appeared today in the Washington Post.  One gives a first-person account of what was apparently a not-so-serious bed bug case, and the second shrugs away the problem as a bunch of media hype.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202662.html" title="article from washington post on bed bugs" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Yes, Tiny, Evil&#8211;and in My Bed&#8221;</a>  is the first, and provides yet another first-person account from a journalist who had bed bugs <a href="http://bedbugger.com/category/journalists-with-bed-bugs/" title="Bedbugger posts about journalists who had bed bugs and wrote about it">(here are a bunch more journalists who had bed bugs)</a>.    Daniela Deane was lucky to get rid of her bed bugs quickly:</p>
<blockquote><p>I probably caught my infestation early, the experts tell me, meaning it hadn&#8217;t yet spread beyond the confines of my bed.</p>
<p>I caught it early because I was lucky enough to be one of the people who show an allergic reaction to the bites. Michael Potter, an entomologist at the University of Kentucky and a leading expert on bedbugs, said that between 20 and 50 percent of people don&#8217;t, meaning the problem can go undetected for a long period of time.</p>
<p><strong>&#8220;If an infestation goes undetected, the bedbugs are much more entrenched into the bed structure and even adjoining structures,&#8221; [bed bug expert Richard] Cooper [of Cooper Pest in New Jersey] said. &#8220;Then it gets very, very difficult to get rid of them.&#8221;</strong></p></blockquote>
<p>Incidentally, Deane suspected she got bed bugs from a favorite pillow she took to a hotel on a vacation.  That&#8217;s the second such report today, since the <a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/mr-k-a-north-carolina-bed-bug-dog-in-action/" title="Mr. K the bed bug dog" target="_blank">woman from Charlotte featured in the video about Mr. K the bed bug dog</a> told the same story.  They could have brought bed bugs home anyway, but a pillow from home makes it so easy.</p>
<p>Nevertheless, the Washington Post felt the need to accompany this story with a second story arguing that the &#8220;media frenzy&#8221; around bed bugs is just hype.  <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202678.html" title="Hmm Tiny Evil and Everywhere">&#8220;Hmm.  Tiny, Evil&#8211;and Everywhere?&#8221;</a> makes one valid point: that there&#8217;s no need for everyone to panic.   While I do think the word &#8220;epidemic&#8221; is appropriate, I agree that &#8220;plague&#8221; is probably an overstatement.</p>
<p>Yes &#8212; bed bugs are not <em>every single place</em> you go everyday, and the thing that makes you itch might not be bed bugs, and often isn&#8217;t.  We at Bedbugger acknowledge that every day, and we are constantly pointing out to visitors that they need to rule out other possibilities &#8212; and strive to get an actual bed bug sample for verification.</p>
<p>That said, it&#8217;s no surprise that Bedbuggers, including myself, don&#8217;t appreciate it so much when articles deny how widespread the problem appears to be, or when journalists discount the true difficulties that a bed bug infestation can bring.  Daniela Deane was very lucky&#8211;by her own account.  Yes, bed bugs are treatable, and no, they are not known to spread any disease (yet).  But they do wreak havoc on one&#8217;s home and, dare I say it, one&#8217;s mental health.</p>
<p>And no, I don&#8217;t mean &#8220;mental health&#8221; as in delusional parasitosis, though experts are often quick to mention people exhibiting &#8220;the matchbox sign&#8221; when they talk about how bed bugs are not as widespread as people think.  The &#8220;matchbox sign&#8221; is what doctors call it when patients turn up with a matchbox (envelope, paper bag) full of lint and particles, claiming they have a sample of what&#8217;s biting them.   No doubt PCOs get a lot of this too.</p>
<blockquote><p> &#8220;We had a lady come in here with a garbage bag she said was filled with bugs that were biting her,&#8221; says Matt Nixon of American Pest Management in <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/related/topic/Takoma+Park?tid=informline">Takoma Park</a>. &#8220;She handed it to my dad and she said, &#8216;If you open that and you get bit, it&#8217;s your problem.&#8217; And there was nothing in there except lint, hair and dry skin. We deal with people like that every week.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Delusional parasitosis is a real &#8212; not imaginary &#8212; medical condition, in which people feel the sensation of insects crawling on them and biting them, when there are no bugs present.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a nice, distracting concept to throw into a story about how the bed bug panic is all hype.  The thing is that bed bugs can be hard to detect.</p>
<p>I grant that the woman with a garbage bag of scraps likely has another condition.</p>
<p>On the other hand, while a customer or patient with an envelope of scraps may have delusional parasitosis, she may also have some other problem or condition, or she may be experiencing real bed bug bites but nevertheless have had trouble finding bed bugs or signs of them.  She may even have had a Pest Control Operator inspect who did not find signs.  Bed bugs do leave visible evidence, but everyone does not know how to find it.  And if the infestation is very new, there may not be a lot of it <em>yet</em>.</p>
<p>So, in response to Matt Nixon&#8217;s story, let me tell you, dear readers, about the kinds of people we at Bedbugger &#8220;deal with every week&#8221;:</p>
<ul>
<li>Readers who are told by qualified PCOs that they do not have bed bugs, after a cursory flip of the mattress yields no black marks or bed bugs;</li>
<li>Pest Control Operators who tell us that &#8211;since we brought them a sample of a spider beetle we found in a bed, that we don&#8217;t have bed bugs (even though the most rudimentary understanding of the scientific method tells us that the presence of a spider beetle does not rule out the presence of bed bugs, and an inspection might be in order).   In one such incident, the PCO actually told the Bedbugger in question, who was covered in itchy bite marks &#8212; without ever entering the home &#8212; that the spider beetles were probably biting her and that they could treat for that (and oh yeah &#8212; they just treated another woman for the same problem) &#8212; even though a cursory glance at university fact sheets tells us spider beetles are a grain pest and do not bite humans.</li>
<li>Well-known and well-respected PCOs who tell us that there&#8217;s no point in inspecting since bed bugs are so hard to detect, so why don&#8217;t they treat anyway?</li>
<li>PCOs who tell us that we don&#8217;t have bed bugs because we do not have bite marks;</li>
<li>Doctors who tell us &#8212; simply by looking at our suspected bite marks &#8212; that we have scabies / that we have bed bugs / that we don&#8217;t have bed bugs &#8212; when it is known that visual inspection is not enough to diagnose either condition definitively;</li>
<li>Landlords who self-treat, hire PCOs who don&#8217;t know what they&#8217;re doing, or hire good PCOs and don&#8217;t pay them to inspect and treat thoroughly;</li>
<li>Landlords who refuse to have neighboring units professionally inspected (since neighbors claim not to have any bite marks), and therefore cause bed bug problems to continue much longer than they need to, and spread to others.</li>
</ul>
<p>I would venture many of these occurrences are as common to me as customers with bags of lint are to pest management professionals, and probably even moreso.</p>
<p>Many people do feel or think they have bed bugs when they don&#8217;t.  But quite often, people with bed bugs have trouble verifying their presence, and it takes a very long time for them to address the problem because they can&#8217;t get the proper assistance to detect and get rid of the problem.</p>
<p>About the health problems bed bugs <em>are</em> known to cause?</p>
<ul>
<li>Not sleeping enough;</li>
<li>Allergic reactions (most who react experience itchy bites, but in some cases, extreme life-threatening reactions do occur);</li>
<li>Stress (which can lead to a host of medical problems);</li>
<li>In rare cases, reactions to pesticides, expecially if treatment goes on for a long time;</li>
<li>In some cases, anxiety and depression.</li>
</ul>
<p>These are usually not life-threatening, but nevertheless are (or can cause) medical problems.</p>
<p>Add this to the other stress-inducing experiences bed bugs cause:</p>
<ul>
<li>Spending a lot of time washing clothes, decluttering and otherwise prepping for bed bug treatment;</li>
<li>Spending thousands on treatment and supplies; and</li>
<li>Undergoing treatment for months and months, since your neighbors may insist they have no bed bugs, or may believe they have no bed bugs, when they are actually continually exporting them to you, or since your landlord may hire someone who does not know what they&#8217;re doing to treat for bed bugs, since &#8212; as Deane cites Michael Potter as saying &#8212; 20-50% of people don&#8217;t react to bed bugs&#8211;and you may be one of them, and have no idea until they are very far along indeed, and you see them cavorting in daylight.</li>
</ul>
<p>Bed bugs may rob you of money, sleep, and time, and cause a great amount of stress.  They can cause real mental health concerns for many.</p>
<p>And saying there&#8217;s no reason for everyone to panic does not mean that bed bugs are not a possibility, since you can indeed encounter them anywhere or bring them home at any time.  Saying there&#8217;s no reason to panic does not mean that governments, businesses, institutions, and individuals should not try and prevent a bed bug infestation, nor that they should not seriously spring into action should one occur.</p>
<p><strong>More, not less, needs to be done by the government to track bed bug infestations and help homeowners, landlords, tenants, and others prevent and deal with them.</strong></p>
<p>The statistics this Washington Post article cites for the incidence of NYC bed bug cases are way off.  The Post claims</p>
<blockquote><p>In New York, the city housing authority has fielded and checked out more than 2,500 bedbug complaints in the past three years; fewer than 500 turned out to be actual infestations.</p></blockquote>
<p>These statistics are incorrect according to all other accounts I&#8217;ve seen.  In NYC public housing, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/12/30/2007-12-30_bedbug_epidemic_attacks_new_york_city.html?page=0" title="Daily News on bed bugs" rel="nofollow">The Daily News</a> reported, in December 2007, there were:</p>
<blockquote><p>. . . <strong>1,708 verified bedbug cases</strong> <strong>in 277 public housing projects this year, the city Housing Authority says.</strong> The Department of Education has documented another 74 cases, spread across 50 schools.</p></blockquote>
<p><strong>That&#8217;s 1708 cases in NYC Housing Authority public housing projects in 2007, not 500 in three years.  And that&#8217;s <em>only</em> in public housing projects.  </strong></p>
<p>Other news sources had much higher figures for infestations in non-NYCHA apartments which were reported to the Housing Preservation Dept. via 311 and verified by the city in fiscal years 2006 and 2007.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.villagevoice.com/news/0650,altman,75270,2.html/2" title="voice on bed bugs 2006" rel="nofollow">The Village Voice reported</a> that</p>
<blockquote><p>Carmen Boon, the spokesperson for New York City&#8217;s Department of Housing Preservation and Development, reports that of 4,638 calls about bedbugs in fiscal year 2006, about a quarter—only 1,195—of those, upon inspection, were actual infestations. That&#8217;s up from two complaints in 2002. That&#8217;s an increase of 231,800 percent (not to mention a 25,000 percent increase in bedbug articles in newspapers and magazines).</p></blockquote>
<p>So HPD got 1195 actual complaints in FY 2006 (July 2005-June 2006).  In December 2007, <a href="http://www.nydailynews.com/news/2007/12/30/2007-12-30_bedbug_epidemic_attacks_new_york_city.html?page=0" title="Daily News on bed bugs" rel="nofollow">The Daily News</a> said Fiscal Year 2007 (July 2006-June 2007) brought significantly more bed bug violations:</p>
<blockquote><p>In the fiscal year that ended in June, 6,889 infestation complaints were logged and 2,008 building owners were hit with summonses.</p></blockquote>
<p>And, as I keep insisting on this here blog, the HPD stats only track bed bug cases of people who complained to 311 and then had a housing inspector verify their bed bug case.  Comparing fiscal year 2006 with fiscal year 2007, according to the stats above, the percentage of 311 complaints which are actual infestations went up (from 25% in FY 2006 to 29% in FY 2007) &#8212; which may mean there were <em>fewer</em> false alarms in 2007 than 2006 (and/or, possibly, that there were more experienced inspectors, who were able to detect more infestations in 2007 than 2006).<strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong>These statistics understate the problem of bed bugs in New York.  Very, very few New Yorkers call 311 to report their problems.   The vast majority will not call to file a complaint with the Housing and Preservation Department, when simply calling your landlord to ask them to fix the problem is the <em>normal</em></strong> <strong>first step in getting help for a problem in your apartment.  </strong></p>
<p>Almost everyone reports bed bugs to their landlords first.  (So all those cases which are then treated by landlords do not get included in the statistics journalists cite.)</p>
<p>Of those whose landlords are uncooperative, or who do not fully solve the problem, some will call 311.  But many also fear filing housing complaints because they fear (rightly or wrongly) that doing so may mean they will have trouble getting a reference when its time to move (and <em>boy</em>, do some folks with bed bugs and unhelpful landlords want to move).</p>
<p>And let&#8217;s not forget that homeowners would never call 311 about bed bugs in their co-op, condo, or house.  Bed bugs infest those homes too.</p>
<p><strong>So even though the Post grossly understates the true level of bed bug violations the city has tracked, it also misses the point &#8212; as every other article stating these statistics so far has done &#8212; that 311 reports of bed bugs are the tip of the iceberg in terms of actual bed bug infestations that occur in New York City.</strong></p>
<p>Of the hundreds of New Yorkers with suspected or confirmed bed bug cases who pass through the Bedbugger forums, few have reported calling 311 and getting the housing inspectors in.  Another confirmation that these statistics understate the problem is that if you read the statistics cited by pest control operators on how many confirmed bed bug cases they treat, they themselves show how much more widespread the problem is.   I have previously quoted statistics from Jeff Eisenberg of Pest Away, who told the Village Voice in December 2006 how many bed bug cases he encountered each day:</p>
<blockquote><p>Out of Eisenberg&#8217;s 100 calls a day, at least 15 percent are wrongly self-diagnosed rashes or lint balls.</p></blockquote>
<p>But as many as 85 calls per day to this single PCO [in late 2006] pertained to actual bed bug infestations!?!   If this happened five days a week, 52 weeks a year, that would be  22,100 actual bed bug cases a year.     And that&#8217;s assuming the number does not keep growing (though other data suggests it has).  Yes, it&#8217;s anecdotal  (we don&#8217;t have data from this company, though I am sure PCOs are keeping track of how many bed bug cases they see).</p>
<p><strong>The city must implement a method of tracking actual bed bug cases in rental units that is not tied to filing a housing complaint.  It is important to know how many people actually have bed bugs in this city.   If the numbers truly are small, then I&#8217;d be happy to hear it.  But I am weary of Housing Authority bed bug complaints or HPD (311) reports of bed bug violations being offered as evidence of how few New Yorkers have bed bugs, when it does not take a genius to see they can&#8217;t possibly represent the true scope of the problem. </strong></p>
<p>Last but not least, the third Post article on bed bugs today, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/22/AR2008022202689.html?sid=ST2008022501935" title="know your bedfellows" rel="nofollow">&#8220;Know Your Bedfellows&#8221;</a> offers &#8220;just the facts&#8221; but nevertheless is not without inaccuracies, for example:</p>
<blockquote><p> <strong>Life span:</strong><strong> </strong>Adults live for about a year. They can survive for several months at a stretch without feeding.</p></blockquote>
<p>Many reputable sources (including the <a href="http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/bedbugs/" title="harvard's bed bug page" rel="nofollow">Harvard site the Washington Post links to</a> in the same article), point out more than a year is possible.  Some say as long as 18 months.  Harvard says:</p>
<blockquote><p>Under ideal conditions, adult            bed bugs can survive for more than one year between meals.</p></blockquote>
<p>The following, also from the Post, is not inaccurate, but tells only part of the story:</p>
<blockquote><p> <strong>Favored hiding sites:</strong><strong> </strong>Mattresses and box springs, as well as cracks and crevices in furniture and walls.</p></blockquote>
<p>Bed bugs are commonly found outside the bedroom, especially in sofas and upholstered furniture, but also desk chairs, in addition to other furniture and walls.   Pointing this out can be helpful.</p>
<p>Unlike the Washington Post, I think bed bugs are underreported.  Every article that comes out, no matter how inaccurate, misleading, or downright insulting to my intelligence (and this is by far not the worst we&#8217;ve seen) is positive in that it makes more people think about bed bugs.</p>
<p>That said, I&#8217;m not terribly impressed with the contribution to bed bug journalism that the second and third articles represent.</p>
<p>How about you?</p>
Similar Posts:<ul><li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/04/07/washington-post-prints-correction-thanks-to-bed-bug-activist/" rel="bookmark" title="April 7, 2008">Washington Post prints correction thanks to bed bug activist</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2008/03/06/columbia-spectator-on-bed-bugs-again-with-the-hpd-statistic-soup/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2008">Columbia Spectator on bed bugs, again with the HPD statistic soup</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2007/07/01/roger-smith-hotel-on-lexington-in-nyc-latest-bed-bug-lawsuit/" rel="bookmark" title="July 1, 2007">Roger Smith Hotel on Lexington in NYC: latest bed bug lawsuit</a></li>

<li><a href="http://bedbugger.com/2006/10/15/lexington-ky-vs-new-york-ny-a-tale-of-two-bedbug-ed-cities/" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2006">Lexington, KY vs. New York, NY: a tale of two bedbugged cities</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.653 ms --><p><a href="http://sharethis.com/item?&wp=2.5.1&amp;publisher=57f95978-99d1-4eff-860f-951174e9e2fa&amp;title=The+Washington+Post+says+to+ignore+the+bed+bug+media+hype&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fbedbugger.com%2F2008%2F02%2F26%2Fthe-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype%2F">ShareThis</a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://bedbugger.com/2008/02/26/the-washington-post-says-to-ignore-the-bed-bug-media-hype/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
