I am not sure how your most recent post is relevant to the topic of this website.

Morris County Prosecutor’s Office
P.O. Box 900 - Court Street
Morristown, NJ 07963-0900
Tel: (973) 285-6200

George A, Veghte
80 New Road, Apt.53
Parsippany, NJ 07054
973-575-1808

Good Day to you
Mr. Robert A Bianchi, Esq.,
Morris County Prosecutor

Today I need to bring a very distressing situation to your attention
However, the resent events with Rutgers Village and a single Police Officer here
In Parsippany have gone way too far now. I have a state witness, A Miss Bambi Malarchak, Inspector 3, from the Department of Community Affairs who came from Trenton to witness this interrogation performed by this police officer on May 27th 08.

Miss Bambi Malarchak was standing nearby, and in both my and the Officers presents during an act of devastating civil and criminal proportions. After requesting information of a nonexistent complaint, from Capitan Bandella, of the Parsippany Police I, Discovered no complaint was actually made, however the police officer acted on his own initiative and decided to harass me in the door way and in front of several other tenants invoking the threat of jail, this was mentioned by this police officer. This is unacceptable and unconstitutional to say the least.

To me, this is a blatant disregard of my Constitutional rights, including as fallows, Harassment, the Making of false Accusations, Invasion of Privacy, Defamation of Character, and possibly also transmitting my personal business on public airwaves for all to hear, causing the further Defaming of my Character.

This unsanctioned visit from this Police officer is a criminal and civil violation of my Constitutional rights. I have not broken any laws trying to help organize the tenants of Rutgers Village with the help of Community Affairs. This is where I live, now and so choose to remain living in peace with the knowledge, that we are all safe from this Kind of, manipulation and the total invasion of all our Constitutional Rights.

We need to have a sit down Sir.
And discuss this terrible injustice as soon as possible.
It is my intention, to press formal charges against the police officer and the Township of Parsippany. Furthermore, if for some possible reason it is discovered through an investigation, that any one, is connected with Faber Builders and Or Grove Associates, or Rutgers Village, and Bedford Management, I will truly seek complete Restitution from all parties involved in this attempted intimidation upon me. I went to talk to Capitan Bandella today and requested a sit down with him directly. However the Capitan was not available for a discussion, so I left a request for him to have a meeting. The Misconduct of the police officer was so ordered by someone possibly connected with Grove Associates / Faber Builders.

Sincerely; George A, Veghte

CC; Certified Mail}, and Regular mail}.

May 20, 2008
Parsippany housing inspector guilty of taking cash from contractor

Probe into development nets 2nd guilty plea in 3 months

By Rob Jennings
Daily Record
NEWARK — A Parsippany housing inspector who allegedly accepted a $5,000 bribe from a contractor pleaded guilty Monday in U.S. District Court.
Thomas Seibel, 59, of Parsippany, faces up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine when he is sentenced Oct. 3.
Seibel’s conviction was the second in three months of a Parsippany official on federal charges. In February, former planning board attorney John J. Montefusco Sr. pleaded guilty to illegally aiding a local developer in exchange for real estate discounts and other benefits for himself and family members.
U.S. Attorney Christopher J. Christie, who launched a probe into Parsippany development more than a year ago, was not in court Monday. His spokesman, Michael Drewniak, did not link the two convictions except in general terms.
“Our investigation of public corruption in Parsippany is continuing,” Drewniak said.
Seibel, appearing before U.S. Judge Joseph E. Irenas at 9 a.m., pleaded guilty to one count of using interstate facilities — the mail and telephone — to distribute and facilitate bribery.
He was released on $25,000 bond.
“Out of respect for the court, we’re not going to comment until sentencing,” Seibel’s attorney, Todd Finchler said afterward.
Seibel admitted meeting in his home with an unnamed contractor last July and agreeing to accept $5,000 in exchange for exempting certain projects from regulation and inspection, according to his plea agreement. The contractor was identified in court papers only as a “cooperating witness” living in Pennsylvania involved with several projects in the Parsippany area.
At the meeting, Seibel allegedly told the contractor to mail the initial payment by check and write, “refund for kitchen cabinets,” on the memo line. He deposited a $2,500 check into his bank account on or about Aug. 10, authorities alleged, and accepted approximately $2,500 in cash at around the same time.
Seibel is one of five inspectors in the housing division and a Parsippany employee since 1997. His 2007 salary was $38,480, business administrator Jasmine Lim said.
Lim, asked about Seibel’s job status following his guilty plea, said only that the town is “taking immediate and appropriate action.”
(Mayor Michael Luther and town housing coordinator Rena Plaxe did not return phone calls Monday.)
Meanwhile, Montefuso’s sentencing — originally scheduled for Wednesday — has been postponed until Sept. 9, Drewniak said.
Montefusco was fired two days after pleading guilty. He is facing up to 20 years in prison and a $250,000 fine at his sentencing on May 21, though the judge has indicated that he will receive a much lighter sentence.
In court papers filed two weeks ago seeking nearly $172,000 in restitution from Montefusco, the town claimed it spent $71,378 in complying with federal subpoenas as part of the investigation.
________________________________________

I, thought,
that everyone should know about this news.

Sincerely; George A, Veghte

http://bedbugger.com/2006/10/22/faq-tenants-landlords-owners-and-bedbugs/

You will need to find out more. We can’t give you legal advice, but the tenants’ link will help you figure out if tenants are liable.

Thanks for the reply. No I am not from the same building I am sorry should have mentioned I am from Chicago. I don’t have the notice of lease termination as it got lost during the 2 times I have moved since then. Our bug infested house itself was quite a mess. anyways. I have only 2 other notices saying they are treating the house and need full support from us. They never asked us to vacate any rooms or anythng and in 2 weeks just gave us a vacating notice. We confirmed many times on phone that they will not charge us lease breakage. They can twist words and charge us for other reasons? How can I find out if lessors are liable to pay for the extermination charges? That wouldn’t be justified, will it… as we couldn’t be knowingly responsible for getting the infestation in the first place and didn’t delay at all in informing. WE never realized what the bites were from for a few weeks. And when we did we immediately informed them.

Regards

I am not clear on whether you live in Quester’s building. In any case, you should consult a lawyer. If you have the lease termination in writing where it says you won’t be charged, then you should be able to fight this. Whether you pay for extermination should be covered by local laws, but charging you after the fact like this seems off to me. I stress I am not a lawyer.

I along with 3 of my roommates faced the bug problem in our apartment in august and reported it immediately to ensure the lesse’s can help us ASAP. They sent exterminator’s twice and said they had treated the apartment and will continue doing so and needed our support. But by the end of august they sent us a notice for vacating the house. It was a lease termination from their end and said we will not be charged for lease breakage. We tried to move out all the stuff and furniture and our own stuff most of which we had to throw away. Just yesterday 24th Nov 07, I got a new mail from them on my new forwarding address, charging us an enormous amount for the same. The reason for this really unreasonably big amount is not clear from the mail but it reads like they could not rent out the apartment for 3 months hence. They go further on to mention that the treatment is still on and the final account/charges/amount will be mailed to us again when thats done. This is rediculous. We cannot pay an amount so high for somethng that is not clearly an inidividuals fault but just bad luck for the tenants as well as the apartment owners. We went through so much trouble to move out at a short notice they cannot even imagine…
Please help with suggestions.