<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Progress, sort of: Times on pestilence in the UK</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/</link>
	<description>bed bug news, information, activism, and support</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 22:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nobugsonme</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5977</link>
		<dc:creator>nobugsonme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 21:00:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5977</guid>
		<description>That's great to hear, Fedup!  I hope all is well with you and your family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s great to hear, Fedup!  I hope all is well with you and your family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fedupandparanoid</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5976</link>
		<dc:creator>Fedupandparanoid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 20:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5976</guid>
		<description>Hi Nobugs, thought you might be interested (and encouraged) to know that although the article was in the life &#38; style/women's section of Times Online in the actual paper it was published in the magazine supplement in Saturday's printed paper.  It was listed under features in the index and was also headlined 'Inside Infested Britainn' on the front cover.  So at least the published version was very much aimed at a general readership.  Incidentally there was also an 'All you need to know about .....bedbugs' article in one of the UK celebrity gossip magazines a few weeks ago.  I don't remember ever reading articles specifically about bedbugs in general interest type publications until recently, and now I have come across two within a few weeks.  I'm so thankful this is being openly featured.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nobugs, thought you might be interested (and encouraged) to know that although the article was in the life &amp; style/women&#8217;s section of Times Online in the actual paper it was published in the magazine supplement in Saturday&#8217;s printed paper.  It was listed under features in the index and was also headlined &#8216;Inside Infested Britainn&#8217; on the front cover.  So at least the published version was very much aimed at a general readership.  Incidentally there was also an &#8216;All you need to know about &#8230;..bedbugs&#8217; article in one of the UK celebrity gossip magazines a few weeks ago.  I don&#8217;t remember ever reading articles specifically about bedbugs in general interest type publications until recently, and now I have come across two within a few weeks.  I&#8217;m so thankful this is being openly featured.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nightshirt</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5953</link>
		<dc:creator>nightshirt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 20:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/09/08/progress-sort-of-times-on-pestilence-in-the-uk/#comment-5953</guid>
		<description>noone would want bb's to be a Life &#38; Style choice!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>noone would want bb&#8217;s to be a Life &amp; Style choice!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
