<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Riding the bed bug wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/</link>
	<description>bed bug news, information, activism, and support</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 00:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: nobugsonme</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2241</link>
		<dc:creator>nobugsonme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 02:45:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2241</guid>
		<description>Since Alex has pointed out that pool grade DE is not an effective way of killing bed bugs (due to the heat treatment, which freshwater food grade DE does not undergo), then the degree of danger it poses is not so much of an issue, though I appreciate the links being shared.  I will (during my next burst of editing energy) correct the DE FAQ somehow to reflect that pool grade DE is ineffective for these purposes.

We've been told by a number of PCOs, entomologists, and DE distributors that pool grade DE is dangerous and not to use it (perhaps they also had its ineffectiveness in mind) and that we should use freshwater food grade DE.    

The only dangers I was aware of from pool grade DE were respiratory, and we do remind people often that freshwater DE also should not be inhaled, and D-20 or drione (freshwater/food grade DE PLUS pyrethroids) is obviously something to be careful with. One person at least complained of an unpleasant experience with drione.

Alex, from what I understand, freshwater/food grade DE is the same stuff taken internally by people and pets.  It's in lots of foodstuffs.  It may be the same as the Pharma. grade you mentioned.  I appreciate all of your input, ane we are unbiased in the sense that we'll chance our instructions and FAQs if we have good evidence pointing us towards doing so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since Alex has pointed out that pool grade DE is not an effective way of killing bed bugs (due to the heat treatment, which freshwater food grade DE does not undergo), then the degree of danger it poses is not so much of an issue, though I appreciate the links being shared.  I will (during my next burst of editing energy) correct the DE FAQ somehow to reflect that pool grade DE is ineffective for these purposes.</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve been told by a number of PCOs, entomologists, and DE distributors that pool grade DE is dangerous and not to use it (perhaps they also had its ineffectiveness in mind) and that we should use freshwater food grade DE.    </p>
<p>The only dangers I was aware of from pool grade DE were respiratory, and we do remind people often that freshwater DE also should not be inhaled, and D-20 or drione (freshwater/food grade DE PLUS pyrethroids) is obviously something to be careful with. One person at least complained of an unpleasant experience with drione.</p>
<p>Alex, from what I understand, freshwater/food grade DE is the same stuff taken internally by people and pets.  It&#8217;s in lots of foodstuffs.  It may be the same as the Pharma. grade you mentioned.  I appreciate all of your input, ane we are unbiased in the sense that we&#8217;ll chance our instructions and FAQs if we have good evidence pointing us towards doing so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Apr 2007 00:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>I understand. And crystalline silica is the issue, clearly, so if some stuff is REALLY high in it, than that's a different issue. The crystals are tiny and fracture into tinier ones -- pretty same as asbestos. Those tiny, sharp crystals get in there and just pop cells. Not good.

Cheers,
AAA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I understand. And crystalline silica is the issue, clearly, so if some stuff is REALLY high in it, than that&#8217;s a different issue. The crystals are tiny and fracture into tinier ones &#8212; pretty same as asbestos. Those tiny, sharp crystals get in there and just pop cells. Not good.</p>
<p>Cheers,<br />
AAA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopelessnomo</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2233</link>
		<dc:creator>hopelessnomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:33:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2233</guid>
		<description>Hi Alex, it is quite possible that I am mistaken.  Unfortunately, I have limited time for this research and so far can only come up with references to WHO's warnings about the ingestion danger for humans and animals of diatomaceous earth with more than 3% crystalline silica content.  Saltwater DE--which is what I understood pool-filter DE was made of--has quite a high percentage of crystalline silica content, close to 60% I think.  You MSDS clearly indicates a less than 1% crystalline silica content, so it would appear that I am wrong.  However, I see repeated warnings on livestock feed providers' websites against pool-grade DE precisely for its ingestion danger to humans and animals--so maybe there are a lot of us who are mistaken.  

Quickly, a couple of warnings:
From a &lt;a href="http://www.reade.com/Products/Minerals-and-Ores/Diatomaceous-Earth-(DE).html" rel="nofollow"&gt;manufacturer&lt;/a&gt;, from a &lt;a href="http://www.safe2use.com/safe-products/diatomaceous/diatomaceous_Earth.htm" rel="nofollow"&gt;natural pesticides purveyor&lt;/a&gt;, and from several other websites that all seem to be reading from the same WHO document that I cannot find.

Perhaps the problem lies in the difference between freshwater and saltwater DE and the varying crystalline silica content in the different varieties available commercially.

I also remember an account somewhere by a pet owner whose cat died from the wrong kind of DE, but that can be anything and not useful as evidence.

Still, my view is that the risk of pool filter DE should not be minimized with an offhand reference to its occupational respiratory hazard!   I'll try to come up with something better tomorrow.

Regrets for not being a more spirited sparring partner.

Best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Alex, it is quite possible that I am mistaken.  Unfortunately, I have limited time for this research and so far can only come up with references to WHO&#8217;s warnings about the ingestion danger for humans and animals of diatomaceous earth with more than 3% crystalline silica content.  Saltwater DE&#8211;which is what I understood pool-filter DE was made of&#8211;has quite a high percentage of crystalline silica content, close to 60% I think.  You MSDS clearly indicates a less than 1% crystalline silica content, so it would appear that I am wrong.  However, I see repeated warnings on livestock feed providers&#8217; websites against pool-grade DE precisely for its ingestion danger to humans and animals&#8211;so maybe there are a lot of us who are mistaken.  </p>
<p>Quickly, a couple of warnings:<br />
From a <a href="http://www.reade.com/Products/Minerals-and-Ores/Diatomaceous-Earth-(DE).html" rel="nofollow">manufacturer</a>, from a <a href="http://www.safe2use.com/safe-products/diatomaceous/diatomaceous_Earth.htm" rel="nofollow">natural pesticides purveyor</a>, and from several other websites that all seem to be reading from the same WHO document that I cannot find.</p>
<p>Perhaps the problem lies in the difference between freshwater and saltwater DE and the varying crystalline silica content in the different varieties available commercially.</p>
<p>I also remember an account somewhere by a pet owner whose cat died from the wrong kind of DE, but that can be anything and not useful as evidence.</p>
<p>Still, my view is that the risk of pool filter DE should not be minimized with an offhand reference to its occupational respiratory hazard!   I&#8217;ll try to come up with something better tomorrow.</p>
<p>Regrets for not being a more spirited sparring partner.</p>
<p>Best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2230</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 21:03:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2230</guid>
		<description>Also, I must stress that the respiratory risk from the crystalline silica in DE (even pool-filter-grade) is from occupational exposures -- not the incidental and occasional exposure you'll get from use in your home as a crack and crevise pest weapon.

If you understand epidemiological lingo, you might find this link useful:http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/58/1/38

This paper from CDC researchers published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine notes that the cummulative lifetime risk of death from lung cancer for white male diatomaceous earth miners (exposed for 45 full years of 5 day per week, 9-5 exposure to current OSHS limit of 0.05 mg of cristobalite crystalline silica per cubic meter of air) is 19 per 1000 men, with a 95% confidence interval that in reality such deaths are between 5-46 deaths per 1000 (which is pretty large spread as far as confidence intervals go).

While this is by no means insignificant and the CDC folks argue it means the current OSHA limit is too lax for DE miners, it does show that the kind of exposures you or I will see in our homes are irrelevant to our health. At no time will your house air carry anywhere REMOTELY CLOSE to 0.05mg silica/cubic meter, let alone carry such levels for any significant period of time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I must stress that the respiratory risk from the crystalline silica in DE (even pool-filter-grade) is from occupational exposures &#8212; not the incidental and occasional exposure you&#8217;ll get from use in your home as a crack and crevise pest weapon.</p>
<p>If you understand epidemiological lingo, you might find this link useful:http://oem.bmj.com/cgi/content/abstract/58/1/38</p>
<p>This paper from CDC researchers published in Occupational and Environmental Medicine notes that the cummulative lifetime risk of death from lung cancer for white male diatomaceous earth miners (exposed for 45 full years of 5 day per week, 9-5 exposure to current OSHS limit of 0.05 mg of cristobalite crystalline silica per cubic meter of air) is 19 per 1000 men, with a 95% confidence interval that in reality such deaths are between 5-46 deaths per 1000 (which is pretty large spread as far as confidence intervals go).</p>
<p>While this is by no means insignificant and the CDC folks argue it means the current OSHA limit is too lax for DE miners, it does show that the kind of exposures you or I will see in our homes are irrelevant to our health. At no time will your house air carry anywhere REMOTELY CLOSE to 0.05mg silica/cubic meter, let alone carry such levels for any significant period of time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2228</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:38:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2228</guid>
		<description>hopelessnomo: I really think you're mistaken. Either you confusing pool-filter DE with something else, or you're confusing pesticide-infused DE with filter DE.

Here is a link to the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for pool filter DE: http://www.inlandreno.com/pdf/m140000100.pdf

I obtained it from this link, showing it is indeed an MSDS for pool-filter DE: http://www.inlandreno.com/details.php?id=38

As you can read, pool-filter-grade DE is so NON-toxic that there is NO toxicity data given for any route of exposure. This means it is so non toxic that they couldn't kill any test animals with it in lab experiments via feeding or other normal exposure route, let alone the death of 50% of test animals for the LD50 test listed (LD50 is shorthand for "Lethal Dose 50% of test population"). 

The only toxicity they refer to is the inhalation/respiratory risk we already discussed. Crystalline silica is a lung irritant and leads to much the same cancer as does asbestos -- both do this via mechanical irritation/rupture of the cells lining the lung. The constant damage and repair initiation (which requires transcribing DNA) inevitably leads to occasional translational infidelity (i.e. mutation) which can lead to cancer.

But I await your links and will defer if/when I stand corrected. 

Thanks for a civil and very interesting thread, y'all.
Cheers,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hopelessnomo: I really think you&#8217;re mistaken. Either you confusing pool-filter DE with something else, or you&#8217;re confusing pesticide-infused DE with filter DE.</p>
<p>Here is a link to the Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) for pool filter DE: <a href="http://www.inlandreno.com/pdf/m140000100.pdf" rel="nofollow">http://www.inlandreno.com/pdf/m140000100.pdf</a></p>
<p>I obtained it from this link, showing it is indeed an MSDS for pool-filter DE: <a href="http://www.inlandreno.com/details.php?id=38" rel="nofollow">http://www.inlandreno.com/details.php?id=38</a></p>
<p>As you can read, pool-filter-grade DE is so NON-toxic that there is NO toxicity data given for any route of exposure. This means it is so non toxic that they couldn&#8217;t kill any test animals with it in lab experiments via feeding or other normal exposure route, let alone the death of 50% of test animals for the LD50 test listed (LD50 is shorthand for &#8220;Lethal Dose 50% of test population&#8221;). </p>
<p>The only toxicity they refer to is the inhalation/respiratory risk we already discussed. Crystalline silica is a lung irritant and leads to much the same cancer as does asbestos &#8212; both do this via mechanical irritation/rupture of the cells lining the lung. The constant damage and repair initiation (which requires transcribing DNA) inevitably leads to occasional translational infidelity (i.e. mutation) which can lead to cancer.</p>
<p>But I await your links and will defer if/when I stand corrected. </p>
<p>Thanks for a civil and very interesting thread, y&#8217;all.<br />
Cheers,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopelessnomo</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2227</link>
		<dc:creator>hopelessnomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2227</guid>
		<description>Ingesting pool-grade DE will kill you and/or your pets.  I will post the links when I have them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ingesting pool-grade DE will kill you and/or your pets.  I will post the links when I have them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2225</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2225</guid>
		<description>Well, you'll note I didn't recommend using pool-grade DE because the heating renders it pretty useless as a mechanical abrasive -- which is where DE gets its anti-insect properties. The mechanical mode of action of DE against insects (again, it scratches the waxy cuticle allowing rapid dehydration) is one reason why no insects have ever developed resistance to it like chemical pesticides.

As for pool-grade DE killing pets: please enlighten me/us. I've not found any evidence that the treatment process of DE to make it a "pool grade" filtration media makes it an ingestion toxin. What I've found indicates it is a respiratory hazard.

As a side note, there is also pharmaceutical-grade (or "medicine grade") DE that is given to animals/humans to kill internal parasites. So DE by itself is pretty inert and harmless as an ingested substance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you&#8217;ll note I didn&#8217;t recommend using pool-grade DE because the heating renders it pretty useless as a mechanical abrasive &#8212; which is where DE gets its anti-insect properties. The mechanical mode of action of DE against insects (again, it scratches the waxy cuticle allowing rapid dehydration) is one reason why no insects have ever developed resistance to it like chemical pesticides.</p>
<p>As for pool-grade DE killing pets: please enlighten me/us. I&#8217;ve not found any evidence that the treatment process of DE to make it a &#8220;pool grade&#8221; filtration media makes it an ingestion toxin. What I&#8217;ve found indicates it is a respiratory hazard.</p>
<p>As a side note, there is also pharmaceutical-grade (or &#8220;medicine grade&#8221;) DE that is given to animals/humans to kill internal parasites. So DE by itself is pretty inert and harmless as an ingested substance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hopelessnomo</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2224</link>
		<dc:creator>hopelessnomo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 20:11:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2224</guid>
		<description>Actually, Alex, in the interest of serving readers who are desperate for solutions, I need to say that pool filter DE is certainly harmful--you could kill your pets with it.    

Further, pool filter DE has no place in insect control because it doesn't work to kill insects--the crystals are too large or something else to do with the heating process that renders it ineffective in killing insects but I'm too rushed to pin it down for you.  Lou Sorkin wrote about this on the yahoo group and I'll try to find it in a moment.

Pool filter is a definite no-no for anything but a pool.   Under no circumstances.  We have to stress this.  Thank you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Alex, in the interest of serving readers who are desperate for solutions, I need to say that pool filter DE is certainly harmful&#8211;you could kill your pets with it.    </p>
<p>Further, pool filter DE has no place in insect control because it doesn&#8217;t work to kill insects&#8211;the crystals are too large or something else to do with the heating process that renders it ineffective in killing insects but I&#8217;m too rushed to pin it down for you.  Lou Sorkin wrote about this on the yahoo group and I&#8217;ll try to find it in a moment.</p>
<p>Pool filter is a definite no-no for anything but a pool.   Under no circumstances.  We have to stress this.  Thank you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bugalina</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2223</link>
		<dc:creator>Bugalina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:50:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2223</guid>
		<description>Alex...You are  a big asset to this site.  Thank you so much for your educated answers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex&#8230;You are  a big asset to this site.  Thank you so much for your educated answers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2222</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 2007 19:40:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bedbugger.com/2007/04/10/riding-the-bed-bug-wave/#comment-2222</guid>
		<description>After a bit of digging, the problem with pool filter DE is that it's heated. This melts the little microscopic spines that make it such an effective abrasive against insect's waxy cuticle, which lead to rapid drying out of the insect and death. Melt the spines and DE isn't a very effective mechanical pesticide.

Also, the heating and chemical treatment of DE convert some of the silica to crystalline silica, which is a respiratory hazard -- though only at occupational levels (i.e. sandblasters, miners, etc.)

So natural DE is far more effective against bugs and somewhat less toxic (respiratory) than food grade -- but neither is the type of hazard to get overly worried about. 

This, of course, does NOT include DE which has been infused with chemical pesticides, of which there are countless formulations and varieties.

Cheers,

The pool grade is chemically treated and partially melted and consequently contains crystalline silica which can be a respiratory hazard.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After a bit of digging, the problem with pool filter DE is that it&#8217;s heated. This melts the little microscopic spines that make it such an effective abrasive against insect&#8217;s waxy cuticle, which lead to rapid drying out of the insect and death. Melt the spines and DE isn&#8217;t a very effective mechanical pesticide.</p>
<p>Also, the heating and chemical treatment of DE convert some of the silica to crystalline silica, which is a respiratory hazard &#8212; though only at occupational levels (i.e. sandblasters, miners, etc.)</p>
<p>So natural DE is far more effective against bugs and somewhat less toxic (respiratory) than food grade &#8212; but neither is the type of hazard to get overly worried about. </p>
<p>This, of course, does NOT include DE which has been infused with chemical pesticides, of which there are countless formulations and varieties.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>The pool grade is chemically treated and partially melted and consequently contains crystalline silica which can be a respiratory hazard.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
