More from Edmonton bed bug evictions case
By nobugsonme on Dec 3, 2006 in alberta, bed bugs, bedbugs, canada, homelessness, housing laws, multi-unit buildings, tales of bed bug woe, treatment
Previously, I blogged about the case in Edmonton, where tenants were evicted for not complying with the preparations for extermination in their apartments (which involved bagging clothes and moving or removing furniture.
Now, the Edmonton Journal is reporting that some tenants who claim to have complied with the preparations for bed bug treatment in their building were nevertheless evicted.
Capital Health says it was unable to successfully fumigate a number of suites at Virginia Arms, 10615 107th St., three times because some residents refused to clear everything out — including clothing and furniture — as required.
The company that owns the building is saying enough is enough, but some of the residents who claim they were complying say they, too, are being forced out.
“We didn’t do anything wrong,” said a resident who asked not to be named. “We let them in and they sprayed, but now they say get out. It doesn’t make sense.”
If this is true, it sounds like some of the residents were compliant and the landlord just wanted an excuse to evict them.
And at least one resident did not fully comply because his health condition meant he could not move his own furniture:
Evicted resident James Whieldon said he tried his best to prepare his suite for the exterminators, but because of a heart condition he cannot lift heavy objects.
“Since I live alone, I couldn’t move the furniture. But they didn’t come and help me or suggest where I should store my stuff while they were spraying,” he said. “They just said, ‘You didn’t do it … get out.’ “
I still think its good the building is taking the pest control operation seriously, since some places would not treat all units nor ask tenants to prepare. But there has to be a system in place for helping people complete such preparations in cases where they can’t move their stuff. The article said:
Preparing for the fumigation process, which usually takes between four and eight hours, meant pulling every piece of furniture away from the walls and washing and double-bagging household items, like clothes and towels, so the bugs have nowhere to hide.
Some of the tenants (like Wheildon quoted above) implied they were being asked to move furniture out of the apartments, not just away from the walls.
It’s interesting that they’re talking about “fumigation”; I’d like to know what exact process they’re using in this building.
Also, on a more humorous note, pay attention to the slightly odd suggestion the Edmonton Journal gives its readers as far as how to remove bed bugs from one’s property:
What to do if your home is infested:
- Call a professional exterminator immediately. The longer you wait, the worse it gets.
That’s good, but read on:
- Household items need to be wrapped in plastic and placed in a hot, sunny location for at least a few days at 120 degrees F. Colder temperatures — below freezing — also can work, but the chilling period must be maintained for at least two weeks. However, attempts to rid an entire home or apartment of bedbugs by raising or lowering the thermostat will be unsuccessful.
It was -11 degrees C (12 degrees F) in Edmonton today. Perhaps the Edmonton Journal should offer some more practical advice to Edmonton residents than that they should leave their items outside in 120 degree F heat– I mean, given there is no outdoor 120 degree F heat in the vicinity, nor will there be for some time to come.




content rss
fightorflight | Feb 12, 2008 | Reply
My experience is that “fumigation” is just a term that lay people, including journalists, friends, co-workers, sometimes landlords and the uninitiated in general like to use as a substitute for what I would call “treatment.” The word seems to betray a general belief that it is easier to get rid of this problem than it usually is.
nobugsonme | Feb 12, 2008 | Reply
Yes–I have noticed this too, ForF.
Occasionally, of course, people do mean fumigation (with gas). Not in most news articles, and I doubt it was so here.